Development and Reform Commission responded to industrial policy disguised as planned economy all co 深度诱惑米洛

Development and Reform Commission to respond to industrial policy is the planned economy countries have disguised: National Development and Reform Commission on September 14, 2016 (Wednesday) morning 9:30, three floor conference room held a press conference with regular theme in the national development and Reform Commission, issued the macroeconomic situation and respond to hot issues, the relevant responsible person attended the press conference and answered questions from reporters. The following is the conference record: Phoenix TV reporter: on the industrial policy debate is especially hot recent speculation, some experts pointed out that the current industrial policy is actually a disguised form of planned economy, the government has a lot of blindness and lag in the development of industrial policy, and even that is not conducive to innovation, industrial policy can be said to be a gamble, the government should not make industrial policies for any industry, it will hinder the development of the market economy, the abolition of all forms of industrial policy is their voice. Do not know the NDRC how to look at this point of view, and how to evaluate the industrial policy? Thank you Zhao Chenxin: I think so. For everything, there are different views and opinions in the society, which is very normal. Of course, the industrial policy is no exception. Since you mentioned this problem, I would like to say something about myself. First, from the current situation, various countries in different stages of development in the use of industrial policy, of course, according to the differences in economic development, national culture and social system, the world industrial policy may be the goal, the content, the measures will be different. However, we have found that all countries are using industrial policy, through industrial policy in different fields, different sides play a role. As one of the most realistic examples, since the international financial crisis, developed countries have attached great importance to the development of the real economy, such as the United States put forward the "advanced manufacturing partnership", and "national strategic plan for advanced manufacturing", some people say this is called "the return of manufacturing". For example, Japan has implemented the strategy of industrial regeneration, and Germany has also issued the "proposal on the implementation of industrial 4 strategy", which are specific embodiment of the use of industrial policies in different countries. Second, we review, since China’s reform and opening up, China’s industrial policy has indeed played a crucial role in the development of china. After the reform and opening up, the Chinese government has promulgated a lot of measures related to industrial development, some are called planning, some are called policies, some are called catalogues, and some related preferential measures. These industrial policies have played an active role in stimulating economic development, promoting structural adjustment, regulating supply and demand relations, etc., and are also the important guarantee for China’s industrial development to achieve brilliant results. Third, we also carefully assess the current industrial policy, China’s economic development has entered a new norm, our existing industrial policy does exist and don’t adapt to the new normal place, from the current implementation of industrial policy, there are some prominent problems urgently to be solved, we must adjust to these related by the policy need to adapt to the new normal. Fourth, in the current situation, it is necessary to co-ordinate the planning of industrial innovation and industrial policy transformation. We will carry out carefully.

发改委回应产业政策是否变相计划经济:各国都有  国家发改委于2016年9月14日(周三)上午9:30,在国家发改委中配楼三层大会议室召开定时定主题新闻发布会,发布宏观经济运行情况并回应热点问题,相关负责人出席发布会,并回答记者提问。  以下为发布会实录:  凤凰卫视记者:  请问近期炒的特别热的关于产业政策争论的问题,有专家指出,目前的产业政策实际上是变相的计划经济,政府在产业政策的制定上是有很多的盲目性和滞后性,甚至认为这不利于创新,产业政策可以说是一场豪赌,政府不应该给任何行业制定产业政策,这只会阻碍整个市场经济发展,废除一切形式的产业政策是他们的呼声。不知道发改委对这样的观点如何看,对产业政策又如何评价?谢谢。  赵辰昕:  我是这么看的,对于任何事物,社会上都会有各种各样不同的观点和看法,这非常正常,对产业政策当然也不会例外,你既然提到了这个问题,我就说点我自己的看法。  第一,从目前的国际情况看,不同发展阶段的各个国家都在运用产业政策,当然,根据经济发展国情、文化、体制等方面的差异,世界各国的产业政策可能在目标上、在内容上、在措施上会有所不同。但是,我们研究发现各国确实都在运用产业政策,通过产业政策在不同领域、不同侧面发挥作用。举一个最现实的例子,国际金融危机以来,发达国家都高度重视实体经济的发展,比如美国提出了“先进制造伙伴计划”,还有“先进制造业国家战略计划”,也有人讲这叫“制造业回归”。比如日本实行了“产业重生战略”,德国也发布了“关于实施工业4.0战略的建议”,这些都是不同国家运用产业政策的具体体现。  第二,我们回顾一下,从中国改革开放以来,我国的产业政策确实对我国的发展发挥了至关重要的作用。改革开放之后,我国政府相继出台了很多与产业发展相关的措施,有的叫规划、有的叫政策、有的叫目录,还有一些相关的优惠措施。这些产业政策对拉动经济发展、促进结构调整、调节供求关系等方面都发挥了积极的作用,更是我国产业发展取得辉煌成绩的重要保障。  第三,我们也在认真评估当前的产业政策,当前我国经济发展进入新常态,我们现有的产业政策确实存在与新常态不相适应的地方,从目前产业政策的实施情况看,也存在一些迫切需要解决的突出难题,我们要通过相关的调整来使这些政策适应新常态的需要。  第四,在当前这种情况下,确实有必要统筹谋划好产业创新发展和产业政策转型。我们将认真贯彻落实党中央、国务院关于推进供给侧结构性改革重大决策部署,牢固树立创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享新发展理念,坚持问题导向和目标导向,发挥市场配置资源的决定性作用和更好的发挥政府作用。按照这样的思路和原则,我们将会同有关方面统筹谋划产业创新发展和产业政策转型的顶层设计,强化改革意识,创新工作方法,积极推动产业迈向中高端水平。  这个问题我就回答这些。谢谢。(中国网)更多精彩内容欢迎搜索关注微信公众号:腾讯财经(financeapp)。相关的主题文章: