Chongqing City Council issued air purifier comparative test report – Chongqing Channel – People’s ne cm68.com

Chongqing City Council issued air purifier comparative test report – Chongqing Channel – People’s network             people’s network Chongqing October 10 (Liu) with the improvement of people’s quality of life, consumers on the family’s air quality requirements are getting higher and higher. In view of the current variety of air purifiers on the market, consumers how to choose? Today, the Chongqing Consumer Protection Commission released a comparative test report of 15 brands of air purifiers which are well known on the market. The comparison test is satisfactory.             it is understood that this comparative test samples were purchased from the network, involving: Matsushita, millet, TCL, Changhong, leopard m, Midea, PHILPS, Honeywell, Daikin, SHARP, three, father 3M, Blueair, A.0., Samsung and other 15 Smith a brand of air purifiers, the price from 598 yuan to 4198 yuan. Among them, 1000 yuan less than 5; 1000 yuan -3000 yuan has 7; more than 3000 yuan has 3.             this test is mainly for safety items and CADR (clean air volume). The performance of air purifier is mainly determined by the ratio of clean air output (CADR), the higher the clean air output ratio (CADR), the higher the purification efficiency of the purifier.             in the comparative test of safety performance, in addition to individual brands, most of the samples are in line with national standards for safety requirements, reflecting the manufacturer’s attention to the safety of household appliances. Only leopard meter CMI300A has electrical parameters and trademarks on the product packaging, but does not express its model specifications, does not meet the national standards for the sign and description of the provisions; in CADR (clean air volume) comparison test sample CADR all conform to the nominal value, the effect is very ideal.             City Council to remind: buy regular products according to the demand of reasonable selection of             a view, product identification is complete, whether to have three packs of cards. The identification of formal products should be as follows: product name, type, trademark, manufacturer, date of manufacture or lot number, execution standard number, etc..             two, it is recommended to buy a regular brand products to a reputable operator or a large shopping mall, and obtain invoices for rights protection. In case of consumption disputes, please promptly complain.          ) 重庆市消委会发布空气净化器比较试验报告–重庆频道–人民网         人民网重庆10月10日电(刘?)随着人们生活质量的提高,消费者对家庭的空气品质要求越来越高。针对目前市场上种类繁多的空气净化器,消费者该如何选择呢?今日,重庆市消费者权益保护委员会发布了目前市场上比较知名热销的15个品牌空气净化器的比较试验报告,此次比较试验中各项指标还是令人满意的。         据了解,本次比较试验的样品均来自网络购买,涉及:松下、小米、TCL、豹米、长虹、美的、飞利浦、霍尼韦尔、大金、三个爸爸、夏普、3M、布鲁雅尔、A.0.史密斯、三星等15个品牌空气净化器,价格从598元到4198元不等。其中,1000元以下有5款;1000元-3000元的有7款;3000元以上的有3款。         此次试验主要针对安全项目和CADR(洁净空气量)。空气净化器性能好坏,主要由洁净空气输出比率(CADR值)决定,洁净空气输出比率(CADR)越大,净化器的净化效率越高。         在安全性能的比较试验中,除个别品牌外绝大多数样品都符合国家标准对安全的要求,体现了厂家对家用电器安全的重视。只有豹米CMI300A在产品包装上标有电参数及商标,但未明示其型号规格,不符合国家标准对标志与说明的规定;在CADR(洁净空气量)比较试验样品CADR全部符合符合标称值,效果非常理想。         市消委会提醒:购买正规产品 根据需求合理选择         一、查看产品标识是否齐全,是否具有三包卡。正规产品的标识应有如下内容:产品名称、型号、商标、制造商、制造日期或批号、执行标准编号等。         二、建议尽量到有信誉的经营者或大型商场购买正规品牌的产品,并索取发票,以便维权。若发生消费纠纷请及时投诉。         三、家用空气净化器产品良莠不齐,建议购买标注新国标的产品。新国标GB T 18801-2015为非强制性标准,一些产品没有按照国家标准给出的颗粒物CADR值、颗粒物CCM、甲醛CADR值、甲醛CCM、净化能效、噪声等参数,却采用“去除率”这一参数。消费者不要花大价钱去买标称除甲醛“去除率”高达99.9%的空气净化器。“去除率”受试验舱容积,运行时间和自然衰减等因素影响,难以反应产品真实净化能力。“去除率”高净化能力未必强。如果不给出实验条件,“去除率”毫无意义。         四、要根据自己的房间大小合理选择,例如:15至20平方米的房间,CADR值达到150的空气净化器,开机1小时可以使室内空气中的PM2.5降低90%以上,能达到空气质量改善的目的。每小时洁净空气量越高,越适合大面积的房间使用,消费者要根据居室条件来选择最适宜的产品。         五、根据房间的需求选购。如果室内烟尘污染较重,可选择除尘效果较好的空气净化器;如果室内装修或购买新家具,其甲醛甲苯污染严重,可选择具有除装修污染功能的净化器;如果室内空气不流通、污浊,细菌、尘螨滋生,可选择具有杀菌、消毒和祛除过敏功能的空气净化器。         六、了解滤网使用周期及产生的费用。净化器过滤网大致可分为甲醛过滤网、活性炭过滤网、HEPA过滤网、复合多功能过滤网,多种过滤网的使用寿命却不同,价格也就不同。因此,消费者在购买空气净化器时要考虑到滤网的使用周期及后续费用。         七、个别产品的皱褶过滤网需消费者自行安装,但未作显著提示,存在瑕疵。消费者应认真阅读说明书,予以安装,否则洁净空气能力会明显下降,耗能也会明显增大。 (责编:刘?、陈琦)相关的主题文章: